🔗 Share this article

On the last weekday, the White House petitioned urgently to the US supreme court, seeking authorization to send military reserve troops to Illinois.

This action is part of a larger push to widen the internal deployment of the troops in several urban centers under Democratic control.

Judicial Challenge Over Guard Activation

In an emergency filing, the US Department of Justice asked the court to set aside a previous judicial decision that had halted the stationing of several hundred military reserve personnel to the Chicago region.

The presiding judge had raised doubts about the government's justification for sending troops, challenging its rationale in given the situation on the ground.

A higher court supported the lower court’s decision on midweek, keeping the activation on standby while the judicial dispute proceeds.

Government's Justifications

The top government lawyer, representing the administration, wrote in the new filing that federal agents have frequently been “intimidated and assaulted” in the city of Chicago and the neighboring town of Broadview area.

This area is home to an federal immigration holding center.

The president has previously sent state guard personnel to Chicago, Illinois and Portland, Oregon, subsequent to previous activations to Los Angeles, California, the city of Memphis, and Washington DC.

The administration has claimed that troop deployment is necessary to control demonstrations and support deportation efforts.

Political Pushback

Elected Democrats have vehemently criticized the action, claiming that the White House's statements are overstated and partisan in nature.

They allege the former president of misusing his executive power to target political rivals.

Court officials have also expressed doubt about the administration’s depiction of events.

Regional authorities say that protests over ICE activities have been primarily limited and peaceful, contrasting with the administration's description of “war zone” situations.

Statutory Grounds

At the core of the conflict is the president’s use of a federal statute authorizing the president to federalize the national guard only in instances of uprising or when “powerless with the standard military to carry out the regulations of the United States”.

The administration insists that the personnel are required to protect US facilities and personnel from protesters.

Latest Events

Earlier this month, the White House nationalized three hundred members of the state guard of Illinois and commanded extra guard from Texas forces into the Illinois.

As state authorities denounced the decision, the former president intensified his language, demanding the apprehension of Chicago’s mayor and the state's chief executive, the two Democratic officials, charging them of not managing to protect immigration officers.

Illinois and Chicago jointly sued the government to halt the deployment.

On October 9, the presiding federal judge, appointed by Joe Biden, handed down a immediate block stopping the directive.

Regional Situations

Simultaneously in the city, at least 11 people were arrested outside the Broadview Ice detention center following heated confrontations between state law enforcement and demonstrators.